<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SLA &#8212;&gt; ASKPro?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libraryjuicepress.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libraryjuicepress.com/blog/?p=1773</link>
	<description>On the intersection of libraries, politics, and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:19:57 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Steeleworthy</title>
		<link>http://libraryjuicepress.com/blog/?p=1773&#038;cpage=1#comment-1007164</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Steeleworthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libraryjuicepress.com/blog/?p=1773#comment-1007164</guid>
		<description>A large part of me is bothered by the proposed SLA name change.  I wonder if the entire profession would be better served if its associations affirmed themselves to be librarians as opposed to &quot;information professionals&quot; and the like.  I&#039;d like to see more librarians speak up about the profession and the profession&#039;s values as they are imbued within librarianship itself - these are terms that have a long-standing history and we shouldn&#039;t let the &quot;sssh&quot; stereotype (along with others) dilute their meaning.

On the other hand, I have to agree with you on the will of the majority.  The membership must decide.  And if the SLA membership does choose to change their name, then so be it.  However, the result of this vote will reflect not only the will of SLA members but also of the larger profession&#039;s (in)ability to demonstrate who we are (let alone the values we profess) in the words we use to identify ourselves.

-ms</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A large part of me is bothered by the proposed SLA name change.  I wonder if the entire profession would be better served if its associations affirmed themselves to be librarians as opposed to &#8220;information professionals&#8221; and the like.  I&#8217;d like to see more librarians speak up about the profession and the profession&#8217;s values as they are imbued within librarianship itself &#8211; these are terms that have a long-standing history and we shouldn&#8217;t let the &#8220;sssh&#8221; stereotype (along with others) dilute their meaning.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I have to agree with you on the will of the majority.  The membership must decide.  And if the SLA membership does choose to change their name, then so be it.  However, the result of this vote will reflect not only the will of SLA members but also of the larger profession&#8217;s (in)ability to demonstrate who we are (let alone the values we profess) in the words we use to identify ourselves.</p>
<p>-ms</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
